Previous posts and a dedicated page cover some revision ideas. Today I – for what feels like the hundredth time – spoke to a class about planning their revision to make sure it is time well spent.
It would be lovely to think all students stared revision early, covered every item several times, and then was able to ask me questions in plenty of time to pass the exam. Our module exam (P1a Energy and Electricity from AQA, for what it’s worth) is in a month and I can assure you they’re not that well organised. These are a few ideas to help.
Students need to know what they need to know. Referring to the exam specification or syllabus can help, or try using an audit to tick off areas they’re happy with and focus on those they’re not. Revision guides can also be useful if they’re exam specific, but a ticklist such as the ones I issue to my students (one below, more to follow) let them set their own priorities. Taking responsibility for their own revision is something which puts them, hopefully, in the right frame of mind too!
Printable: P1a revision checklist
Of course, one of the dreaded situations is when you ask “What don’t you understand?” and they answer “Everything!”
A traffic light system can be very effective – and is easy for a teacher to use in lessons. Simply ask students to grade topics as green (I understand this now and would be confident to answer questions on it) amber/orange/yellow (I’m not sure about this and could do with more time or extra examples) or red (I don’t get this and need someone else to help me). Bullseye diagrams or similar can also be used to think through which topics are better understood than others.
Sometimes I ask students to add post-it notes to a board on which I’ve written headings so they can add those topics they are confident on. This can be modified so they volunteer themselves as ‘tutors’ on one topic and get help on others, an activity that can be long or short (saved as Word doc: Students as Tutors).
In general, these activities or similar ones – as usual, please add any of your own in the comments – help students to figure out what they need to know as far as the exam board are concerned, and what they specifically aren’t good at yet. Next step: effective revision that fills the gaps they’ve identified.
I have to confess, this is on my bedside table having just picked it up last week, rather than an established part of my reference library. Making Sense of Secondary Science has already been useful as a guide to research showing what students really think. Knowing what ideas and misconceptions they have really helps to prepare for what you’re going to teach them. This is particularly true if you want to approach it by showing them – or even better, letting them collect – evidence which contradicts what they have always believed.
I think this book will get used more as I produce more detailed schemes of work to use in my school. I have often started topics by asking student what they think they know, and ocassionally by giving them part of the test to assess previous understanding. This is a step in a more research-based approach.
After some specifically KS3 ideas, here’s one that can take you a little further. I was given The Resourceful Physics Teacher (by Keith Gibbs, but not currently available from Amazon or the Book Depository) by my friend Marion. She’s also a physics teacher and assured me it would be useful and it has indeed become well-thumbed.
The book includes the practical details, tangential suggestions, tips and tricks that help to turn a standard demonstration into something a bit more special. It also has explanations for teachers and models to use with students, and I would certainly recommend it for non-specialists wanting to get a few ideas as well as experienced or new physics teachers wanting to up their game.
While checking this post I’ve found he now runs a website with a load of usable content, http://www.schoolphysics.co.uk/, which I will add to my links as soon as I’ve had a proper chance to check it out…
Continuing the theme from yesterday, a time saver. I picked up a BBC KS3 Bitesize book, Check and Test Science. Each page has a summary of an idea, such as ‘special cells’ or ‘selective breeding’, which uses key words and simple diagrams. The bottom third of each page has questions to test what a student knows, which can be answered (or at least explained) by the facts above.
Again, the questions aren’t anything we couldn’t manage ourselves. The advantage comes when you’re short of time or low on inspiration. Numerical examples and specific chemical equations stop you from using the same, easy to remember versions each time.
As far as I can see, this book isn’t available many places new but finding something similar should be easy. I’m currently looking for something along these lines to use for KS4 topics, so please let me know if you have any recommendations.
As teachers, it’s really easy to end up reinventing the wheel. At my school, like many others, we have mountains of schemes of work, resources and worksheets. Like many other schools, I suspect, finding the best resources to use for any given lesson, at any given time, can be a challenge. For my KS3 students I often use a book I’ve had since my placement to help kick off lessons.
101 Red-Hot Science Starters is easily worth the fiver or so it costs. Organised by topic, the ideas are quick and simple to put up on a board, and include answers as well as differentiated outcomes. If you’re organised, you could put a series together on a powerpoint if you’re lucky enough to have regular electronic whiteboard access.
It’s not, I hasten to add, that you couldn’t come up with the ideas yourself. On the contrary, my book has many scribbled additions of my own. Instead, it’s that coming up with starters (or plenaries – many are versatile) takes time which most of us are short of. This gives me, I reason, another five minutes per lesson to plan a main activity.
Instead of one longer post, this week I’m planning to post five times, but much shorter. Let’s see how it works out.
I read all the time. What I read informs my teaching, from thrillers and other fiction to recent popular (and unpopular) science. However, there are some books I return to time and again which really help my lessons.
I have old copies of A-level revision guides for Biology, Chemistry and Physics, picked up for almost nothing in charity shops. Instead of the guides most of my students use today, these are not linked to one specific (and now obsolete) syllabus. Instead, they are arranged as a dictionary, with scientific terms listed in alphabetical order. I find them indispensible to dip into for quick and clear definitions, links to similar ideas, applications and simple line diagrams.
You can buy new copies (the Complete A-Z Physics Handbook, for example, is available at The Book Depository for about £12) but for a teacher the old versions are probably as good, maybe better. If you find an extra copy, why not keep one at work and one at home?
The bad news is, an incredibly bad bit of ‘science’ has once more reared its ugly head. The good news is, the story in the Daily Telegraph here is a fantastic opportunity to teach our students an awful lot about science…
Hilarious update – Cliff is now claiming we should all ignore it and be happy instead, says a different article in the same newspaper!
First of all, it’s based on previous work by Cliff Arnall, who might reasonably be described as a media-whore for repeatedly wasting our time with this sort of inanity. In fact, this is yet another use of his non-science as reported last year by Ben in his excellent column. Cliff has form. The Telegraph really should know better. I tell my students that although not totally reliable, Wikipedia is a good place to start looking for information. That the newspaper have ignored this wealth of evidence suggests they think their readers are idiots.
Apart from anything else, it doesn’t seem that he is currently employed by the University they link him with. Instead he is a self-employed life coach and pilot. Ahem. He managed to find time a few months back to suggest you could work out the formula for the perfect toy. How does he get it all done.
I actually wonder if the Telegraph got all the ideas – some more sensible than others – from the same press release, or if they just decided to save themselves time by cramming as much lousy science and tenuous correlations as they could think of into the same article. I’m actually going to put their suggestions in a list.
- chocolate is good for you, say Venezuelan endrocrinologists – or, more to the point, the same scientist who has been pushing this idea for the last fifteen years or so.
- have flowers in the house or garden. Some specific species are mentioned and I think I know why – they happen to be on offer through, yes, the Daily Telegraph
- use bright morning light, says Vicki Ravell, a sleep researcher who should possibly make her conflicts of interest – she is a paid speaker for a company who make devices designed to simulate bright morning light – clearer in this sort of story.
- Cancel meetings, says a business coach (and, as it happens, member of the newspaper’s ‘panel of experts’ for the Readers’ Clinic). Presumably the Telegraph staff have a Monday meeting they’d like to skip. Who doesn’t?
- Bite a pencil to make you smile
- Book a holiday – interestingly, it is Richard Wiseman who is quoted here, despite the fact that Cliff Arnall is usually sponsored himself by holiday companies to promote this story each January. The previous ‘biting a pencil’ idea is also referenced in Wiseman’s (excellent) book, 59 Seconds,as is the following:
- Imagine your own death (says another author)
- Eat fresh fruit and herbs, specifically those advised by Cherry Chapell, a PR hack who has also written a few books – she is an expert in that she has a collection of Grandma’s Remedies published. Presumably these are what we would call ‘old wives tales’ or ‘anecdotes’.
- Eat chilli, which among other effects, destroys mitochondria. Hopefully I don’t need to point out that this effect is presumably not relevant when eating it or we would all be in trouble – and if it was, it would be spectacularly bad advice. There seem to be some suggestions that chilli helps prevent cancer as it kills off cancer cells. How healthy cells are not affected presumably remains a mystery.
- We should eat with fat friends as this prompts us to eat less, according to a report from last year, also reported in the Telegraph and many other newspapers.
- Listen to music while we exercise to try and get more out of it. Hmm. Well, I have to admit, running in the morning is slightly less painful with loud rock playing (Lost Prophets anyone?), but I found this quite a tenuous link. Until I found out that the expert in question has a compilation CD out to help people try and get more out of exercise. So that would be the science bit then.
- Be nice to people at work and see if the effects get passed on. Well, can’t hurt.
- Get more sleep because it will help you lose weight, said a study a few years back. Although how this – and many of the other things – will help you in the course of a single bad day is beyond me…
I can’t help it – let’s do the maths.
Five suggestions that are effectively adverts, six if we count ‘book a holiday’ and four research items that are, quite possibly, a few years old and irrelevant to daily life. Out of thirteen ideas.
Do I need to write this as an equation for people to take my opinion seriously?